Home Sold Today
Tyneside Marketing
Google Ads Account Review — April 2026

Your Account at a Glance

We’ve completed a full review of your Google Ads account. This document sets out what we found, what it means, and what we’re building to replace it.

£5,229
Lifetime Spend
5
Campaigns (All Paused)
60–70%
Est. Wasted Spend
0/10
Avg Quality Score

Strong foundations, significant opportunity

Your brand, your website, and your position in the local market are all assets. The Google Ads account, however, wasn’t set up to take advantage of them. The campaigns were running without reliable tracking, without negative keywords, and without the structure that Google’s algorithm needs to find the right people.

The good news: none of these issues are permanent. They’re configuration problems, and we know exactly how to fix every one of them. This review covers the five key areas we’ll address, along with a clear plan and timeline.


What was running

Five campaigns have been created in the account over its lifetime. All are currently paused. Here’s what each one delivered:

Campaign Type Spend Clicks “Conversions” Note
We Buy Properties For Cash PMax £2,916 14,985 5,053 Tracking issue — see below
Leads (Search) Search £1,053 354 18 Broad match, no negatives
Pmax PMax £720 2,394 16 Performance Max
Jan 2026 CASH HOME BUYERS Search £197 107 0 Low budget, short run
AI Campaign Search £343 264 255 97% conv. rate — tracking issue

* “Conversions” in quotes because the tracking configuration means these numbers don’t reflect real enquiries. We explain why below.


Conversion tracking needs rebuilding

Critical

Conversion tracking is the foundation everything else sits on. When Google knows what a “good” outcome looks like, its algorithm gets smarter with every click. When it doesn’t, it optimises for the wrong signals and wastes money.

Currently, the account has 7 conversion actions, all counting as primary goals simultaneously. Several of these are inflating the numbers significantly.

What Google was counting

5,053
“conversions” from one campaign alone
  • “Chat — Opened” — fires every time someone opens the chat widget, multiple times per visit
  • “purchase” — a GA4 e-commerce event on a site that doesn’t sell anything
  • “generate_lead” — counted multiple times per click, categorised as page view

What should be counted

1
conversion action: genuine enquiry
  • Form submission on landing page
  • One count per person, not per click
  • Meaningful data for smart bidding to learn from
  • Real cost-per-lead you can trust

What this means in practice: The PMax campaign reported 5,053 conversions from 14,985 clicks — a 33% conversion rate. The AI Campaign showed 97%. These numbers aren’t real. Smart bidding was optimising to get people to open the chat widget (not to submit an enquiry), which means the algorithm was actively chasing the wrong audience.

Our fix: Purpose-built landing pages on a subdomain with a single, clean conversion action — form submission only. One count per enquiry. This gives Google a clear signal to optimise against, and gives you a cost-per-lead number you can actually use.


Irrelevant traffic consuming the budget

Critical

Every campaign used broad match keywords with zero negative keywords. This means Google had full discretion over which searches triggered your ads — and much of what it chose was completely off-target.

~65%
Wasted
~65% irrelevant — jobs, estate agents, buying a house, unrelated brands
~10% ambiguous — could go either way without landing page context
~25% relevant — people genuinely looking to sell a property fast

Based on search term analysis across all campaigns, we estimate 60–70% of total spend went to clicks from people who were never going to sell you a property. Here are real examples from the account:

Top wasted search terms

“rightmove” £50.74
“uk remote jobs no experience” £43.78
“karbon homes” £25.01
“purple bricks app” £21.30
“hartlepool job centre”
“night shift jobs gateshead”
“warehouse jobs near me”
“houses for sale”
Wrong Intent

People looking to buy

Searches like “houses for sale”, “run down properties for sale near me”, and “house to buy” — the exact opposite of what you need.

Competitor Brands

Estate agent searches

Rook Matthews Sayer, Jan Forster, William H Brown — people looking for specific estate agents, not cash buyers.

AI Campaign Keywords

Google’s auto-generated keywords missed the mark

The AI Campaign included keywords like “DIY”, “jobs”, “career”, “renting”, “cheap houses”, “rightmove”, and “zoopla”. Without conversion guardrails, the algorithm targeted volume rather than relevance.

Our fix: Phrase and exact match keywords only, targeting people who specifically want to sell. Comprehensive negative keyword lists built from this account’s actual wasted spend data — jobs, buying, renting, estate agent brands, property portals, and more.


Campaign structure limiting performance

Significant

Well-structured campaigns give Google clear signals about what each ad group is for, which improves ad relevance and Quality Score — and ultimately brings down your cost per click.

Now

Single ad groups

All keywords dumped into one ad group per campaign. No separation by intent, location, or theme. Multiple campaigns targeting overlapping keywords.

New Build

Structured by intent

Separate ad groups for “sell fast”, “cash buyer”, and situational terms (inherited, divorce, repossession). Ad copy matched to each group.

Quality Score breakdown

Quality Score is Google’s rating of your ad relevance (1–10). Higher scores mean lower costs and better positions. Almost every keyword in the account currently scores 0.

Current avg
0/10
Best keyword
3/10
Our target
7+/10
Budget Leak

Display Network enabled on Search campaigns

All search campaigns had the Content/Display Network switched on, which means ads were appearing on random websites and apps alongside search results. For lead generation, this typically produces low-quality clicks at scale.

Geo Targeting

Inconsistent location settings

One campaign targeted all of the UK with 200+ individual area exclusions, rather than targeting the North East directly. This approach is harder to manage and prone to leaking budget into areas you don’t serve.


Budget and bidding misaligned

Significant

Most campaigns were set at £1/day — far too low for Google’s algorithm to gather meaningful data. At the cost-per-click rates in this market (£10–40), a £1 daily budget might produce one click every few days, which gives the system nothing to optimise with.

On top of that, smart bidding strategies were active — but with broken conversion tracking, the algorithm was optimising for chat widget opens and phantom page views. No CPC caps were set on any campaign, which meant Google had no upper limit on what it could pay per click.

Our approach: £1,000/month split across three campaigns (50% Newcastle, 25% Sunderland, 25% Middlesbrough). Maximize Clicks with CPC caps to start, transitioning to Target CPA once we have at least 15–30 real conversions. Every penny accountable.


The competitive landscape is wide open

Opportunity

This is the best part. We looked at every competitor in the North East cash buyer space, and the local landscape is remarkably thin right now.

Sell With Richard

Website currently down. Previously had location pages targeting similar keywords. Unable to receive enquiries via their site.

We Buy Homes NE

Website also down. Another local operator currently unreachable online.

Sold North East

New entrant. Small presence, no reviews. Not yet a serious threat.

National Players

We Buy Any House, The Property Buying Co, etc. Faceless national brands — no local trust, no local knowledge.

Your advantages right now

  • Already #2 in the Google Local Pack for key searches — genuine local authority
  • Two direct local competitors have their websites down — you have the field
  • National operators are faceless and impersonal — your “local, committed, we follow through” angle is a genuine differentiator
  • You have real reviews, a real team, and a real track record — trust signals the nationals can’t match

What we’re building

We’re starting from a clean foundation. Three purpose-built campaigns, each with structured ad groups, dedicated landing pages, and proper tracking. Here’s the full picture:

🎯

3 Search Campaigns

Newcastle, Sunderland, Middlesbrough. Separate budgets, separate targeting, separate performance data.

📑

Structured Ad Groups

Keyword groups by intent: “sell fast”, “cash buyer”, and situational (inherited, divorce, repossession). Tailored ad copy for each.

🏠

Landing Pages

Purpose-built pages on sell.homesoldtoday.co.uk. Designed for one thing: turning clicks into enquiries.

Clean Tracking

One conversion action: form submission. One count per enquiry. Real cost-per-lead numbers you can trust.

🚫

Negative Keywords

Comprehensive exclusion lists built from your account’s actual wasted spend — jobs, buying, renting, brands, portals, and more.

📈

Monthly Reporting

Real metrics: cost per lead, conversion rate, cost per acquisition. No vanity numbers. Data you can use to make decisions.

Professional RSA ad copy

15 headlines and 4 descriptions per ad group, crafted around your core message: certainty, speed, and commitment. Google will test combinations and surface the best performers automatically.


From here to go-live

9 April
Account Review
✓ Complete
w/c 14 April
Campaign Spec
◄ You are here
w/c 21 April
Build & Test
1 May
Go Live

What happens at each stage

  • Account Review (today) — full audit of existing campaigns, tracking, keywords, and competitors
  • Campaign Spec — finalised keyword lists, ad group structure, bid strategy, landing page wireframes
  • Build & Test — landing pages built and tested, campaigns built in Google Ads, tracking verified end-to-end
  • Go Live — campaigns switched on, daily monitoring begins, first performance check at 2 weeks